Trump And Vance Aren’t Defying The Constitution, They’re Following It
Democrats and pundits have exaggerated Vice President J.D. Vance’s remarks into a ‘constitutional crisis.’
Under the Constitution, “the President is invested with certain important political powers, in the exercise of which he is to use his own discretion.” For his decisions, “he is accountable only to his country in his political character, and to his own conscience.” His choices cannot be questioned in court because “the subjects are political. They respect the nation, not individual rights, and being entrusted to the executive, the decision of the executive is conclusive.”
Who penned these outrageous words? Democrats and many pundits might answer Vice President J.D. Vance. Over the weekend, Vance provoked an onslaught of criticism for suggesting that federal district judges “aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.”
But the usual suspects would be wrong. The right answer is John Marshall, the greatest chief justice in Supreme Court history. And he did not squirrel this view away in a private journal. Instead, Marshall publicly explained that courts could not review presidential decisions on “political” subjects “entrusted to the executive” in a Supreme Court opinion.
Constitutionalism
.webp)
Trump’s Risky Reliance on the Alien Enemies Act
A symbolic show of resolve on illegal immigration could hamper Trump’s effort to revive the Monroe Doctrine.
Trump’s Worthy Effort to Rein In ‘Independent’ Agencies
The Trump administration is making a bold and principled attempt to restore these wayward bodies to the control of the executive branch.
.jpg)
Why Legal Education Needs Abraham Lincoln
Ilya Shapiro's Lawless: The Miseducation of America’s Elites unveils the corruption in legal education.
Impeachment: Is Judge Boasberg Guilty of a “High . . . Misdemeanor?”
The phrase “high . . . Misdemeanors” means non-capital, but serious, crimes explains the organization of the Article II Impeachment clause.
