Example Image
Civitas Outlook
Topic
Constitutionalism
Published on
Dec 8, 2025
Contributors
John Yoo

Why State Courts Should Not Set National Energy Policy

Contributors
John Yoo
John Yoo
Senior Research Fellow
John Yoo
Summary

Judges are improperly turning courts into bastions of climate activism.

Summary

Judges are improperly turning courts into bastions of climate activism.

Listen to this article

The Framers of our Constitution never intended for officials in Boulder, Colo., or any city, to set the energy and climate policy for the entire nation. The Supreme Court may have a chance to bolster the principle of federal supremacy over truly nationwide problems in a case pending for review, Suncor Energy Inc. v. Boulder.

Boulder’s lawsuit uses tort law — a body of state-made law that addresses accidents and noncriminal harms — to reshape national energy policy. After failing to push sweeping Green New Deal–style mandates through Congress, climate activists have turned their efforts toward the judicial system. Dozens of states and cities have filed copycat lawsuits that incredibly claim that energy companies have sold their product to unwitting consumers without disclosing the harms of climate change. These flimsy claims tempt judges into indulging their personal political preferences and imposing restrictions on energy that the political system has already rejected. This is not the proper use of the courts, but an effort to use the judiciary to sidestep public debate and democratic checks and balances.

Read the full article at National Review.

10:13
1x
10:13
More articles

Why Humans Aren’t Clever Chimps

Pursuit of Happiness
Apr 24, 2026

Canadians Must Stop Romanticizing a Failing Europe

Politics
Apr 23, 2026
View all

Join the newsletter

Receive new publications, news, and updates from the Civitas Institute.

Sign up
More on

Constitutionalism

Amicus Brief: Hon. William P. Barr and Hon. Michael B. Mukasey in Support of Petitioners

Former AGs Barr and Mukasey Cite Civitas in a SCOTUS Brief

Michael Toth
Constitutionalism
Sep 22, 2025
Rational Judicial Review: Constitutions as Power-sharing Agreements, Secession, and the Problem of Dred Scott

Judicial review and originalism serve as valuable commitment mechanisms to enforce future compliance with a political bargain.

John Yoo
Constitutionalism
Sep 15, 2025
Amicus Brief: Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish

Civitas Research Fellow Michael Toth's work was cited in a Supreme Court brief.‍

Michael Toth
Constitutionalism
Sep 11, 2025
Epstein & Yoo: Amicus Brief in Supreme Court of Maryland

Civitas Senior Research Fellows Richard Epstein and John Yoo, alongside the Mountain States Legal Foundation, filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of Maryland.

Richard Epstein, John Yoo
Constitutionalism
Jul 24, 2025

The Libertarian

The inimitable Richard Epstein offers his unique perspective on national developments in public policy and the law.

View all
** items

Law Talk

Welcome to Law Talk with Richard Epstein and John Yoo. Our show is hosted by Charles C. W. Cooke.

View all
** items
Birthright Citizenship Has a Long Historical Precedent

John Yoo
Constitutionalism
Apr 2, 2026
State Courts Can’t Run Foreign Policy

Suncor is also a golden opportunity for the justices to stop local officials from interfering with an industry critical to foreign and national-security policy.

John Yoo, Michael Toth
Constitutionalism
Feb 24, 2026
Supreme Court tariff ruling should end complaints that justices favor Trump

John Yoo writes on the Supreme Court’s decision on President Trump’s tariff case.

John Yoo
Constitutionalism
Feb 20, 2026
Supreme Court showdown exposes shaky case against birthright citizenship

Supreme Court will hear challenges to Trump's order ending birthright citizenship, testing the 14th Amendment's guarantee for babies born in America.

Constitutionalism
Dec 10, 2025

Laying down the law on birthright citizenship

Constitutionalism
Apr 26, 2026
1:05

Limited Government | 2026 National Review Institute Regional Seminars

Constitutionalism
Apr 17, 2026
1:05

Supreme Court interested in 'original' meaning of 14th Amendment

Constitutionalism
Apr 1, 2026
1:05

UChicago Prof. Richard Epstein Weighs in on the Supreme Court’s Decision Regarding Trump’s Tariffs

Constitutionalism
Feb 23, 2026
1:05

Federal law under the Constitution is always 'supreme'

Constitutionalism
Jan 27, 2026
1:05
No items found.
No items found.
Separation of Powers and Our Constitutional Freedoms

'Separation of Powers' contains something of benefit to everyone, from first-year law students to grizzled veterans of the post-New Deal wars.

Paul J. Larkin
Constitutionalism
Apr 23, 2026
Justice Alito Is the Jurist America Needed

Mollie Hemingway’s recent book provides just enough information about Alito’s life to satisfy those who would like to know about his upbringing and life before joining the Court, and, more importantly, how that upbringing helped to shape his values and approach to judging.

John G. Malcom
Constitutionalism
Apr 22, 2026
It’s Time to Combat Abuse of Agency Guidance – Again.

The federal courts cannot comprehensively limit administrative state power, but an Executive Order could do helpful work.

Aaron L. Nielson
Constitutionalism
Apr 21, 2026
SAVE America, SAVE the Senate

The path Thune has chosen includes elements of both the nuclear option and talking filibuster.

Constitutionalism
Apr 20, 2026
No items found.