Example Image
Civitas Outlook
Topic
Constitutionalism
Published on
Sep 15, 2025
Contributors
John Yoo
Photo by Sebastian Pichler on Unsplash

Rational Judicial Review: Constitutions as Power-sharing Agreements, Secession, and the Problem of Dred Scott

Contributors
John Yoo
John Yoo
Senior Research Fellow
John Yoo
Summary
Judicial review and originalism serve as valuable commitment mechanisms to enforce future compliance with a political bargain.
Summary
Judicial review and originalism serve as valuable commitment mechanisms to enforce future compliance with a political bargain.
Listen to this article

Summary

Scholars have engaged in a sharp argument over whether the judiciary should follow the original understanding in interpreting the Constitution. Recent criticism has argued that originalism fails because it does not advance a substantive moral or political good. This paper responds to this criticism by advancing an instrumental justification for originalism. It argues that a nation may fail to make a constitution because regions with differing policy preferences may not trust each other to obey the agreement after ratification. Constitution-makers can overcome this obstacle by committing to future enforcement of the agreement by an independent judiciary. To maintain the founding bargain, the judiciary would interpret the constitution based on the original understanding of its makers. Using Dred Scott as a case study of a failure in constitution making because of a flawed application of originalism, this Article argues that judicial review and originalism serve as valuable commitment mechanisms to enforce future compliance with a political bargain.

Continue reading at University of California Law Journal.

10:13
1x
10:13
More articles

Goodbye, Information Age

Economic Dynamism
May 1, 2026

Chicago’s “Disappearing Middle Class” Can Be Found in Its Proliferating Upper Middle-Class Neighborhoods

Economic Dynamism
Apr 30, 2026
View all

Join the newsletter

Receive new publications, news, and updates from the Civitas Institute.

Sign up
More on

Constitutionalism

Amicus Brief: Hon. William P. Barr and Hon. Michael B. Mukasey in Support of Petitioners

Former AGs Barr and Mukasey Cite Civitas in a SCOTUS Brief

Michael Toth
Constitutionalism
Sep 22, 2025
Amicus Brief: Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish

Civitas Research Fellow Michael Toth's work was cited in a Supreme Court brief.‍

Michael Toth
Constitutionalism
Sep 11, 2025
Epstein & Yoo: Amicus Brief in Supreme Court of Maryland

Civitas Senior Research Fellows Richard Epstein and John Yoo, alongside the Mountain States Legal Foundation, filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of Maryland.

Richard Epstein, John Yoo
Constitutionalism
Jul 24, 2025
Religious Exemptions?: What the Free Exercise Clause Means

A conversation among three religious liberty scholars on the Free Exercise Clause’s original meaning.

Andrew Koppelman, Michael McConnell, Vincent Phillip Muñoz
Constitutionalism
Apr 28, 2025

The Libertarian

The inimitable Richard Epstein offers his unique perspective on national developments in public policy and the law.

View all
** items

Law Talk

Welcome to Law Talk with Richard Epstein and John Yoo. Our show is hosted by Charles C. W. Cooke.

View all
** items
Birthright Citizenship Has a Long Historical Precedent

John Yoo
Constitutionalism
Apr 2, 2026
State Courts Can’t Run Foreign Policy

Suncor is also a golden opportunity for the justices to stop local officials from interfering with an industry critical to foreign and national-security policy.

John Yoo, Michael Toth
Constitutionalism
Feb 24, 2026
Supreme Court tariff ruling should end complaints that justices favor Trump

John Yoo writes on the Supreme Court’s decision on President Trump’s tariff case.

John Yoo
Constitutionalism
Feb 20, 2026
Supreme Court showdown exposes shaky case against birthright citizenship

Supreme Court will hear challenges to Trump's order ending birthright citizenship, testing the 14th Amendment's guarantee for babies born in America.

Constitutionalism
Dec 10, 2025

Article II and the Growth of the American Presidency with John Yoo

Constitutionalism
Apr 27, 2026
1:05

Laying down the law on birthright citizenship

Constitutionalism
Apr 26, 2026
1:05

Limited Government | 2026 National Review Institute Regional Seminars

Constitutionalism
Apr 17, 2026
1:05

Supreme Court interested in 'original' meaning of 14th Amendment

Constitutionalism
Apr 1, 2026
1:05

UChicago Prof. Richard Epstein Weighs in on the Supreme Court’s Decision Regarding Trump’s Tariffs

Constitutionalism
Feb 23, 2026
1:05
No items found.
No items found.
Justice Harlan and President Trump Are Right About Birth Tourism

The Supreme Court should follow Justice Harlan’s lead: Children of illegal aliens are citizens at birth, but children born to pregnant women on temporary tourist visas are not.

Josh Blackman
Constitutionalism
Apr 30, 2026
Courting Tyranny

Politicians who care about preserving American freedom and greatness for another 250 years should speak and write in ways that strengthen Americans’ confidence in the judiciary.

Timothy Harper
Constitutionalism
Apr 28, 2026
The Olympus Spa, Denuded by the 9th Circuit

In its opinion, the Olympus Spa majority acknowledged, “where public accommodations laws impermissibly burden constitutional rights, public accommodations laws must give way.” But its analysis defied the very principle it recognized.

Sarah Parshall Perry
Constitutionalism
Apr 28, 2026
Separation of Powers and Our Constitutional Freedoms

'Separation of Powers' contains something of benefit to everyone, from first-year law students to grizzled veterans of the post-New Deal wars.

Paul J. Larkin
Constitutionalism
Apr 23, 2026
No items found.