Epstein: Tim Kaine’s Misunderstanding of Natural Rights
Original description from Chicago's Morning Answer:
University of Chicago law professor Richard Epstein criticized Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) for comments made at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing suggesting that rights come from government rather than from a higher source. Epstein called the remarks historically inaccurate and philosophically misguided, pointing back to the natural rights tradition of John Locke and the framing of America’s founding documents.
Epstein explained that Locke’s view established government as a limited institution created by the people to protect inherent rights of life, liberty, and property. By contrast, systems where rights are granted solely by the state—whether in absolute monarchies, theocratic regimes, or modern progressive models—open the door to coercion and abuse. Jefferson’s reference to “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” in the Declaration of Independence, Epstein noted, was a conscious acknowledgment that rights exist independently of government power.
The professor also raised concerns about today’s political and academic climate. He argued that universities, dominated by one ideological viewpoint, are producing dogmatic graduates unprepared for debate. Epstein said that free expression is increasingly being replaced by cancellation and, in extreme cases, violence—an inversion of the First Amendment principle that offense is not grounds to silence others.
Epstein warned that when indignation is treated as justification for censorship or force, the rule of law is undermined. He urged a return to robust debate, institutional diversity, and limited government as the antidote to the polarization now evident in politics and culture.
.png)
Constitutionalism
Amicus Brief: Hon. William P. Barr and Hon. Michael B. Mukasey in Support of Petitioners
Former AGs Barr and Mukasey Cite Civitas in a SCOTUS Brief
Rational Judicial Review: Constitutions as Power-sharing Agreements, Secession, and the Problem of Dred Scott
Judicial review and originalism serve as valuable commitment mechanisms to enforce future compliance with a political bargain.
.avif)
State Courts Can’t Run Foreign Policy
Suncor is also a golden opportunity for the justices to stop local officials from interfering with an industry critical to foreign and national-security policy.
Courting Tyranny
Politicians who care about preserving American freedom and greatness for another 250 years should speak and write in ways that strengthen Americans’ confidence in the judiciary.
The Olympus Spa, Denuded by the 9th Circuit
In its opinion, the Olympus Spa majority acknowledged, “where public accommodations laws impermissibly burden constitutional rights, public accommodations laws must give way.” But its analysis defied the very principle it recognized.
Separation of Powers and Our Constitutional Freedoms
'Separation of Powers' contains something of benefit to everyone, from first-year law students to grizzled veterans of the post-New Deal wars.
Justice Alito Is the Jurist America Needed
Mollie Hemingway’s recent book provides just enough information about Alito’s life to satisfy those who would like to know about his upbringing and life before joining the Court, and, more importantly, how that upbringing helped to shape his values and approach to judging.
