Example Image
Civitas Outlook
Topic
Politics
Published on
May 11, 2026
Contributors
Arthur Herman
America guided by wisdom: An allegorical representation of the United States depicting their independence and prosperity. Drawn by John J. Barralett ; engraved by B. Tanner.

Founders Versus Managers: America’s Endless Civil War

Contributors
Arthur Herman
Arthur Herman
Senior Research Fellow
Arthur Herman
Summary
The struggle between two mindsets—founders versus managers—will forever shape the future of the American nation.

Summary
The struggle between two mindsets—founders versus managers—will forever shape the future of the American nation.

Listen to this article

This year, we celebrate the 250th anniversary of America’s founding. It’s also a year when U.S. power and influence seem almost unlimited.

That power had been demonstrated with the success of Artemis II, which has reinforced the success of America’s private companies like Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin in dominating the world’s space sector, who are now competing to build the lander for Artemis III and the return to the moon for the first time since 1972.  

We see it in the success of America’s AI industry, which today accounts for 74-75 percent of global AI supercomputing capacity (China holds just 15 percent). Its founders are transforming every sector from defense and health care to reindustrialization.

We see an energy sector that produces more oil and natural gas than Russia and Saudi Arabia combined, thanks to founders like Harold Hamm, who pioneered fracking technology.

We’ve even seen it in the war in Iran, where America’s unsurpassed military power has been unleashed by a former businessman, a president who understands Douglas MacArthur’s adage: “there is no substitute for victory.”

Each case reveals the power of what is called the founder’s mindset: the vision, energy, drive, and willingness to risk it all to achieve astonishing results. That mindset runs like an electric charge through American history.

From Washington and Jefferson to Henry Ford and Steve Jobs to Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk—even from Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King to Donald Trump and the late Charlie Kirk—that visionary and daring mindset forms the core of what we call American exceptionalism.

At the same time, and at every stage, American founders have had to face opposition and doubt. Indeed, it’s the constant struggle between founders and those who prefer managing problems rather than solving them through bold action that has shaped the nation from 1776 until now.

The need for bold action is how founders see the world. They are mission and vision-driven, with a commitment that is fierce and uncompromising. They hate delegating and want to oversee the details of every stage in making their vision happen. They are highly risk-tolerant, even notoriously so—whether it’s Washington crossing the Delaware or Elon Musk launching the first Falcon rocket. As founders, they tend to see risk as an opportunity rather than as a danger signal.

Yet another American mindset prefers certainty and predictability to venturing into the unknown—whether it’s heading into space or across the corporate balance sheet.

It lives by the mottos of “Stick to your knitting” and “Stay in your lane.”  While founders have a built-in bias toward bold action, what we can call the manager’s mindset has another favorite adage: “Look before you leap.” 

The manager mindset is risk-averse, not out of cowardice but because it feels institutions like corporations and governments do best sticking to the tried and known, whereas the unknown and untried are comfortable terrain to the typical founder. 

The manager asks, “How can we do this better?” The founder asks, “Why are we doing this at all?” If the answer doesn’t satisfy, the founder is ready to strike out in an entirely new direction, even at the risk of everything they’ve created before.  

That’s a way of operating that managers, government bureaucrats, lawyers, and conventional politicians are bound to see as a challenge, sometimes even an existential threat. They push back in ways that provide much of the drama and conflict in our 250-year history.

This happened during the American Revolution itself, with those at the Constitutional Congress who argued passionately against independence—and who believed we were entering a war with Britain, we could only lose.

Later, most, if not all, politicians argued that the answer to slavery and Southern secession had to be compromise and negotiation, not war. They condemned Lincoln as “King Lincoln” for daring to mobilize for a fight to the finish with the Confederacy. They would have been relieved to see Lincoln lose the 1864 election, rather than have him press on for final victory and the abolition of slavery across America as the fulfillment of its founding principles.

Then, after the Civil War, came those who defamed business founders like John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and railway magnate James J. Hill as “robber barons,” and who used anti-trust laws and the Interstate Commerce Commission to frustrate their success in making America the richest and most powerful industrial nation on earth.

Still later, there were those who saw FDR’s support for Britain in World War II as too risky and who demanded compromise with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, even as Ronald Reagan was organizing the final victory.

We see a similar mindset today in opposition to the twin revolutions in AI and crypto, and a desire to punish our leading Silicon Valley and tech founders and innovators for their success. We even see it with the pushback against Trump’s war with Iran, which has been amazingly successful, but where opponents only see disaster and doom.

The perpetual struggle between these two mindsets—founders versus managers—has shaped the outcome of America’s history from its very beginning. It’s also shaping our present and future.

All the same, it’s not a battle of good versus evil. Every corporate founder recognizes the value of good managers in keeping their vision alive—but also knows bad managers can doom their company to stagnation and decline. 

Government bureaucrats and lawyers can ensure that founders obey the rule of law, while politicians make sure they respond to the requirements of democracy, although the latter can act as demagogues in condemning founders’ success.

In the end, and at the most crucial moments in our history, it’s been the ability of founders to break free of conventional constraints and expectations; to look beyond the immediate horizon and to venture into the unknown; to face down the doubters and incrementalists and move America forward; that has kept the nation true to its original founding principles—and kept it aimed to a bigger and better future.   

Arthur Herman is the author of Freedom’s Forge: How American Business Produced Victory in World War Two. His latest book, Founder’s Fire: From 1776 to the Age of Trump, is now available from Center Street/Hachette.  

10:13
1x
10:13
More articles

'Pluribus' Is About More Than 'the Warmth of Collectivism'

Pursuit of Happiness
May 8, 2026

The Firestorm Over Congressional Redistricting

Constitutionalism
May 8, 2026
View all

Join the newsletter

Receive new publications, news, and updates from the Civitas Institute.

Sign up
More on

Politics

Is American Nationalism Still Creed-able?

We are not there now, but there is reason to worry that the United States is in danger, if we are not careful, of ceasing to be a nation with the principles of 1776 at its core.

Richard Samuelson
Politics
Apr 29, 2026
National Civitas Institute Poll: Americans are Anxious and Frustrated, Creating a Challenging Environment for Leaders

The poll reveals a deeply pessimistic American electorate, with a majority convinced the nation is on the wrong track.

Politics
Feb 19, 2026
Liberal Democracy Reexamined: Leo Strauss on Alexis de Tocqueville

This article explores Leo Strauss’s thoughts on Alexis de Tocqueville in his 1954 “Natural Right” course transcript.

Raúl Rodríguez
Politics
Feb 25, 2025
Long Distance Migration as a Two-Step Sorting Process: The Resettlement of Californians in Texas

Here we press the question of whether the well-documented stream of migrants relocating from California to Texas has been sufficient to alter the political complexion of the destination state.

James Gimpel, Daron Shaw
Politics
Feb 6, 2025

The Three Whiskey Happy Hour

Steven Hayward brings you the Power Line Blog's perspective on the week's big headlines.

View all
** items
Iranian-Americans Want Regime Gone — Aside From a Few Gun-Running Social Media Mavens

Joel Kotkin
Politics
May 4, 2026
California is Sacrificing its Economic Future on the Altar of Climate Change

John Yoo, Michael Toth
Politics
Apr 26, 2026
The Left’s War on the Supreme Court Just Hit a Terrifying New Low

John Yoo
Politics
Apr 25, 2026
Canadians Must Stop Romanticizing a Failing Europe

Joel Kotkin
Politics
Apr 23, 2026

May Day Protests Take Place Across the U.S.

Politics
May 1, 2026
1:05

How Gavin Newsom Ran California Into The Ground

Politics
Apr 30, 2026
1:05

WHCD Shooting Suspect Allegedly Targeted Trump Administration Officials

Politics
Apr 26, 2026
1:05

All federal law enforcement agencies must answer to the president: Former deputy assistant AG

Politics
Apr 16, 2026
1:05

‘NO RIGHT to block passage’: John Yoo on Strait of Hormuz Dispute

Politics
Apr 10, 2026
1:05
No items found.
No items found.
Teddy Roosevelt’s Expansive Spirit

Roosevelt left a mark not only on the American presidency but also on the American imagination, continuing to affirm the necessity of the American myth.

Emina Melonic
Politics
May 7, 2026
Trumpadelic

Lives are at stake, not just elections.

Paul J. Larkin
Politics
May 6, 2026
Why Amtrak Needs Airport-Level Security

Cole Allen transporting weapons across the country on Amtrak highlights the issue.

Jonathan Hartley
Politics
May 5, 2026
Remembering and Rebuking the Covid Regime

Preventing a future repetition of this exercise in pandemic central planning will require removing “emergency” powers from political authorities who are all too keen to use them as instruments to impose an unattainable societal order.

Phillip W. Magness
Politics
May 4, 2026
No items found.