Example Image
Civitas Outlook
Topic
Economic Dynamism
Published on
Jul 2, 2025
Contributors
Wagner Menezes
Aerial view of Rio de Janeiro with Christ Redeemer and Corcovado Mountain. (Shutterstock)

Brazil and the United States: A Strategic Hemispheric Partnership

Contributors
Wagner Menezes
Wagner Menezes
Wagner Menezes
Summary
Brazil and the U.S. share a historic, strategic partnership rooted in democracy and economic ties. Renewed cooperation is crucial to counter China’s influence and build a stable, prosperous hemispheric order.
Summary
Brazil and the U.S. share a historic, strategic partnership rooted in democracy and economic ties. Renewed cooperation is crucial to counter China’s influence and build a stable, prosperous hemispheric order.
Listen to this article

Brazil and the United States share a longstanding history of diplomatic, economic, and strategic cooperation in the Western Hemisphere. These historical ties are among the foundational pillars of regional stability. Based on shared political values such as liberal constitutionalism and representative democracy, both countries have developed a relationship that transcends commerce, establishing themselves as key actors in building a hemispheric order grounded in peace, cooperation, and development.

In this context, the promotion of strong institutions, the rule of law, and democratic constitutionalism should be understood as essential elements in crafting a sustainable regional agenda. Brazil and the United States share legal traditions that provide a common foundation for advancing democratic governance across Latin America.

Since the United States became the first country to recognize Brazil’s independence in 1824, the two nations have pursued a path of steady rapprochement. Over two centuries, their relationship has expanded on several fronts — military, economic, educational, technological, and environmental. In the 20th century, this partnership acquired strategic dimensions. During World War I, Brazil joined the Allied cause. In World War II, the cooperation included U.S. military bases in Northeastern Brazil — vital for the South Atlantic campaign — and the deployment of the Brazilian Expeditionary Force (FEB), which fought alongside the Allies in Europe.

During the Cold War, Brazil and the US signed multiple agreements aimed at containing Soviet expansionism. They collaborated within the Organization of American States (OAS) and other multilateral bodies. With the rise of globalization in the 1990s, both countries engaged in trade liberalization and integration efforts, notably the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), though progress stalled due to structural differences.

Today, the bilateral relationship remains economically significant. In 2023, trade between Brazil and the U.S. exceeded USD 88 billion, making the U.S. Brazil’s second-largest trading partner after China. Major sectors in this exchange include fuels, aircraft, machinery, fertilizers, soybeans, and chemicals. Additionally, the United States remains a major source of foreign direct investment in Brazil, with over USD 120 billion invested.

Yet, since the early 2000s, U.S. foreign policy has shown signs of disengagement from Latin America, refocusing on the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific — especially after the September 11, 2001, attacks. This shift coincided with China’s emergence as the region’s primary economic partner. Since 2009, China has been Brazil’s top trading partner, and by 2021, it had overtaken the U.S. as the leading financier of infrastructure projects across Latin America, particularly in the energy, transportation, and mining sectors. Chinese investment in Brazil is estimated at over USD 70 billion.

This economic realignment signals a significant transformation in regional power dynamics, weakening traditional inter-American integration. China’s growing presence offers not only an alternative economic partnership but also a new vector of political and normative influence, especially in infrastructure, digital connectivity, and energy transition. Without a coordinated response from the U.S., Brazil, and other countries, longstanding alliances in the hemisphere have eroded.

Amid emerging multipolarity, fractured supply chains, rising demand for minerals and commodities, and global geopolitical tensions — such as Russia’s actions in Eastern Europe and China’s assertiveness — a strategic realignment of inter-American relations becomes necessary. In this scenario, Brazil is a natural and essential partner for a renewed and meaningful U.S. engagement in Latin America.

This partnership should extend beyond bilateral cooperation to serve a broader regional role. Through joint initiatives, Brazil and the U.S. can act as catalysts for a new regional architecture, promoting institutional cohesion, constitutional stability, and mechanisms of shared prosperity. A revitalized agenda should rest on principles of shared sovereignty, strategic cooperation, and mutual benefit. This alignment can unfold along multiple dimensions, including diplomatic coordination in forums such as the UN, OAS, and G20, with a focus on issues like cybersecurity, climate action, and the global governance of artificial intelligence.

A new hemispheric integration model that considers national asymmetries, offering compensatory mechanisms for less developed countries and supporting regional value chains.

Expansion of educational and scientific exchanges, including programs like Fulbright, and promoting technological collaboration in sensitive fields such as biotechnology, renewable energy, and AI. Universities can act as engines of knowledge diplomacy.

Revitalization of infrastructure investments, including bi-oceanic corridors, integrated energy grids, railways, and digital platforms. Such projects would foster South American integration with Brazilian leadership and U.S. technological and financial input.

Maritime cooperation via a hemispheric code with standardized regulations, port modernization, enhanced surveillance in Exclusive Economic Zones, and joint efforts to combat transnational crime. A collective maritime security agenda in the South Atlantic would create a new axis of strategic coordination.

The integrated airspace and environmental monitoring, alongside measures to counter drug and arms trafficking. Technical-military collaboration should emphasize joint capacity building and the protection of strategic resources.

Such initiatives would not only restore mutual trust but also lay the groundwork for a new cooperation architecture with a broad regional impact. A clear and forward-looking strategic partnership between Brazil and the U.S. — the two largest economies in the hemisphere — is not merely desirable; it is crucial for the consolidation of a democratic, prosperous, and peaceful region.

Ultimately, this vision depends on political realignment that reinforces both individual freedoms and collective rights. It must be rooted in inclusive development as the cornerstone of a renewed inter-American pact — one capable of addressing 21st-century challenges with unity, resilience, and a commitment to hemispheric security.

Wagner Menezes is a Professor at the University of São Paulo – USP. Member of BeLatin. He was visiting professor at University of California at Berkeley in 2019 and 2024.

10:13
1x
10:13
More articles

Birthright Citizenship Has a Long Historical Precedent

Constitutionalism
Apr 2, 2036

Lina Khan’s Continued Influence on the FTC

Economic Dynamism
Apr 6, 2026
View all

Join the newsletter

Receive new publications, news, and updates from the Civitas Institute.

Sign up
More on

Economic Dynamism

The Price of Stagnation: Britain’s Retreat from Dynamism

We face a basic issue: we do not let cities or communities grow or die.

Robert Colvile
Economic Dynamism
Mar 25, 2026
London and the Architecture of Creative Growth

Preserving London's creative dynamism will require humility from policymakers and a commitment to keeping the city liveable.

Munira Mirza
Economic Dynamism
Mar 10, 2026
Do Dynamic Societies Leave Workers Behind Economically?

We need a more dynamic economy that can help workers by allowing them to move where they can best use their skills.

Sam Dumitriu
Economic Dynamism
Mar 3, 2026
Do Dynamic Societies Leave Workers Behind Culturally?

Technological change is undoubtedly raising profound metaphysical questions, and thinking clearly about them may be more consequential than ever.

Economic Dynamism
Feb 17, 2026
No items found.
‘Liberation Day,’ One Year Later

Richard M. Reinsch II
Economic Dynamism
Mar 23, 2026
Venture Global vs. Shell: How a Startup Won Big In LNG

The future of energy innovation depends on courts adhering to the rule of law and holding companies — regardless of their size — to the deals they made.

Michael Toth
Economic Dynamism
Mar 20, 2026
The Myth of the Post-Industrial Economy

The time for an industrial renaissance is now.

Joel Kotkin
Economic Dynamism
Feb 28, 2026
Downtowns are dying, but we know how to save them

Even those who yearn to visit or live in a walkable, dense neighborhood are not going to flock to a place surrounded by a grim urban dystopia.

Economic Dynamism
Feb 3, 2026

Is Scientific Progress Best Achieved Through Publicly Funded Research Initiatives?

Economic Dynamism
Feb 19, 2026
1:05

18% Poverty Rate in the World's 4th Largest Economy | Joel Kotkin

Economic Dynamism
Jan 27, 2026
1:05

Michael Toth | A Coast-to-Coast Railroad for America

Economic Dynamism
Jan 9, 2026
1:05

Neo-Feudalism: Tech Oligarchs and the Secular "Clerisy"

Economic Dynamism
Oct 20, 2025
1:05

Unlocking Housing Supply: Market-Driven Solutions for Growing Communities

Economic Dynamism
Sep 30, 2025
1:05
The Hidden Costs of Expanding Deposit Insurance

Expanding deposit insurance will only exacerbate financial risk and regulatory dependence, imposing costs on banks, their customers, and taxpayers. 

Daniel J. Smith
Economic Dynamism
Nov 7, 2025
No items found.
Lina Khan’s Continued Influence on the FTC

Consumer welfare and the U.S. business climate are especially subject to the blows dealt at the FTC.

Jessica Melugin
Economic Dynamism
Apr 6, 2026
A Year of Tariff-Induced Stagnation

Broad-based tariffs won’t “liberate” anyone; they’re simply another way for the government to impose self-inflicted economic wounds.

Richard Stern
Economic Dynamism
Apr 2, 2026
End Long-Term Capital Gains Taxes

It’s time for a Roth Revolution.

Michael Toth
Economic Dynamism
Apr 1, 2026
The Tax Code Is the Abundance Agenda’s Missing Villain

A debate focused almost entirely on permitting and regulatory reform is insufficient. The tax code cannot remain a footnote. It is the missing villain.

Veronique de Rugy, Adam Michel
Economic Dynamism
Mar 31, 2026
No items found.