‘Liberation Day,’ One Year Later
The president vowed to usher in an economic rebirth. He instead delivered inefficiencies and job losses.
Nearly one year after President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” speech on April 2, 2025, in which he announced the imposition of tariffs on nearly every country in the world, the administration’s tariffs remain highly unpopular with the nation. According to a recent poll by YouGov, 60 percent of Americans strongly or somewhat approve of the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision to strike down the sweeping levies.
At the time, Trump had boldly declared that Liberation Day would “forever be remembered as the day American industry was reborn, the day America’s destiny was reclaimed, and the day that we began to make America wealthy again,” claiming that the tariffs would raise “trillions and trillions of dollars” to reduce taxes and pay down the national debt. “Jobs and factories will come roaring back into our country … and ultimately, more production at home will mean stronger competition and lower prices for consumers,” he added.
Yet today, the promises of those in power must be constantly trimmed to account for their negative side effects. Those with memories longer than a news cycle will recall that the response from the equity, debt, and currency markets to the April 2 “declaration of economic independence” was so immediately and overwhelmingly negative—the S&P 500 declined 10 percent, the dollar fell, and bond prices plummeted—that Trump had to reverse course, suspending the tariffs and then lowering them. Currently, 52 percent of imported items are exempt from tariffs because of trade agreements, exemptions, and carve-outs.
Read the full article on The Dispatch.
Economic Dynamism
.jpg)
London and the Architecture of Creative Growth
Preserving London's creative dynamism will require humility from policymakers and a commitment to keeping the city liveable.
Do Dynamic Societies Leave Workers Behind Economically?
We need a more dynamic economy that can help workers by allowing them to move where they can best use their skills.
.jpg)
Venture Global vs. Shell: How a Startup Won Big In LNG
The future of energy innovation depends on courts adhering to the rule of law and holding companies — regardless of their size — to the deals they made.
.jpg)
.webp)
The Tragedy of Paul Ehrlich
In Ehrlich's view of the world, every new person is just a stomach and a pair of hands.
Cut Licensing, Cut Prices, Embrace AI
There’s a quiet and much more practical reform that could win support from both sides and truly bring down prices: occupational licensing.
