Do We Still Really Need the Bureau of Labor Statistics?
It is time for the monthly story of the labor market to be told more clearly, and more reliably, through data from other sources.
The editor of RealClearMarkets, John Tamny, has a point. An important question to debate today should be: is the Bureau of Labor Statistics still relevant today?
While the August firing of BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, and the subsequent appointment of E.J. Antoni by President Trump have created quite a political stir, the discussion should focus on the use and importance of the BLS’ major product: the monthly jobs report which is eagerly awaited by the business community, the White House and the media.
As a key indicator, the BLS’ Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey has been known to move the stock market. However, since the CES is a survey, it is subject to sampling error. Often the initial headline number is released despite 30 to 40% of the businesses in the sample not having responded in a timely manner. This forces the BLS to “run” with what it has for the monthly release. Hence the variability of the original number.
Economic Dynamism
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Kevin Warsh and the Future of Fed Communication
Warsh is right that the Federal Reserve should not speak so loudly that it hears only its own echo.
An AI Commencement Address That Might Not Elicit Boos
Someone has to dare to point the path forward in those communities. We need many more Nehemiahs.
