Higher Ed’s Diseconomies of Scale
.webp)
Texas has six public university systems. Good, explains Charity-Joy Acchiardo
In Texas, we take pride in doing everything BIG. That seems to apply to our university systems, as well. While other states have one or two public university systems, we have six! “Why?” a colleague recently asked. “Wouldn’t Texas be better off merging some of its systems and saving on administrative costs?”
My inner economist immediately balked at this idea. More is generally better, correct? A number of past Nobel laureates came to mind. Certainly F. A. Hayek would agree that multiple systems foster innovation, as each strives to move ahead in the discovery process, experimenting with new models in a dynamic educational landscape. George Akerlof might argue that each system and its individual institutions build a distinct brand and reputation over time, which serves as a crucial signal of quality to students and employers. Elinor Ostrom could highlight the benefits of polycentric governance, which allows individual systems to tailor their programs and rules to the specific, unique needs and circumstances of their local area.
The question piqued my curiosity, so I did a little digging to see how administrative costs in Texas compare to those of North Carolina, where my colleague calls home. The American Council of Trustees and Alumni has built a wonderful tool to compare university administrative costs across the United States.
Economic Dynamism
Do Dynamic Societies Leave Workers Behind Economically?
We need a more dynamic economy that can help workers by allowing them to move where they can best use their skills.
.jpg)
Do Dynamic Societies Leave Workers Behind Culturally?
Technological change is undoubtedly raising profound metaphysical questions, and thinking clearly about them may be more consequential than ever.
The War on Disruption
The only way we can challenge stagnation is by attacking the underlying narratives. What today’s societies need is a celebration of messiness.
Unlocking Public Value: A Proposal for AI Opportunity Zones
Governments often regulate AI’s risks without measuring its rewards—AI Opportunity Zones would flip the script by granting public institutions open access to advanced systems in exchange for transparent, real-world testing that proves their value on society’s toughest challenges.
Downtowns are dying, but we know how to save them
Even those who yearn to visit or live in a walkable, dense neighborhood are not going to flock to a place surrounded by a grim urban dystopia.
.jpeg)
.jpg)
AI Needs Consumer Choice, Not Bureaucratic Control
The regulatory approach treats consumer AI as a problem to be solved rather than as another service best left to a competitive, dynamic market to provide consumers with autonomy and choice.
The Start-Up Paradox: The Coming Red Shift in Innovation
Despite London's success, the future of innovation is securely in American hands for the foreseeable future.
