Example Image
Civitas Outlook
Topic
Constitutionalism
Published on
Dec 16, 2024
Contributors
Vincent Phillip Muñoz

What is an Establishment of Religion? And What Does Disestablishment Require?

Contributors
Vincent Phillip Muñoz
Vincent Phillip Muñoz
Non-Resident Senior Fellow
Vincent Phillip Muñoz
Summary
Vincent Phillip Muñoz reviews Agreeing to Disagree: How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of Conscience by Nathan S. Chapman and Michael W. McConnell.
Summary
Vincent Phillip Muñoz reviews Agreeing to Disagree: How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of Conscience by Nathan S. Chapman and Michael W. McConnell.
Listen to this article

Strange as it may seem, as of this writing (Summer of 2023), it is not exactly clear what the Establishment Clause prohibits. In Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (2022), the Supreme Court announced that the “Lemon” and “endorsement” tests had been “abandoned,” meaning, presumably, that the federal judiciary should no longer utilize these “wall of separation” doctrines.[2] But it did not clarify the rule or test judges should use in future Establishment Clause cases. Instead, the Court resolved the question of whether a public school’s football coach could pray on the field after games using the Free Exercise and Free Speech Clauses.[3]

Given the unsettled state of Establishment Clause jurisprudence, Nathan Chapman and Michael McConnell’s new book, Agreeing to Disagree: How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of Conscience, is especially well-timed. And its argument is especially well-suited to the current moment. Agreeing to Disagree explores the Establishment Clause’s meaning in light of history and tradition, the current Supreme Court majority’s preferred mode of engagement.[4] In their own way, moreover, Chapman and McConnell appeal to diversity and inclusion—two of the reigning ideals of elite opinion. The book’s breadth, levelheadedness, and accessibility is commendable, and the prominence of its authors—Chapman is the Pope F. Brock Associate Professor of Professional Responsibility at the University of Georgia School of Law and McConnell is the Richard and Frances Mallery Professor and Director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School and perhaps the nation’s most distinguished church-state legal scholar—ensure the book’s influence. Some originalists, however, will have reservations about the book’s methodology, and some of the authors’ historical claims extend beyond the available evidence. Nonetheless, Agreeing to Disagree is likely to become a particularly important guide as the Court develops its next phase of Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

Read Full Paper at Constitutional Commentary

This paper was originally published by the University of Minnesota Law School's Constitutional Commentary journal.

Continue Reading & Download PDF
10:13
1x
10:13
More articles

The Fall of the Last Mainline Seminary

Pursuit of Happiness
Sep 16, 2025

Rational Judicial Review: Constitutions as Power-sharing Agreements, Secession, and the Problem of Dred Scott

Constitutionalism
Sep 15, 2025
View all

Join the newsletter

Receive new publications, news, and updates from the Civitas Institute.

Sign up
More on

Constitutionalism

Rational Judicial Review: Constitutions as Power-sharing Agreements, Secession, and the Problem of Dred Scott

Judicial review and originalism serve as valuable commitment mechanisms to enforce future compliance with a political bargain.

John Yoo
Constitutionalism
Sep 15, 2025
Amicus Brief: Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish

Civitas Research Fellow Michael Toth's work was cited in a Supreme Court brief.‍

Michael Toth
Constitutionalism
Sep 11, 2025
Epstein & Yoo: Amicus Brief in Supreme Court of Maryland

Civitas Senior Research Fellows Richard Epstein and John Yoo, alongside the Mountain States Legal Foundation, filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of Maryland.

Richard Epstein, John Yoo
Constitutionalism
Jul 24, 2025
Religious Exemptions?: What the Free Exercise Clause Means

A conversation among three religious liberty scholars on the Free Exercise Clause’s original meaning.

Andrew Koppelman, Michael McConnell, Vincent Phillip Muñoz
Constitutionalism
Apr 28, 2025

The Libertarian

The inimitable Richard Epstein offers his unique perspective on national developments in public policy and the law.

View all
** items

Law Talk

Welcome to Law Talk with Richard Epstein and John Yoo. Our show is hosted by Charles C. W. Cooke.

View all
** items
Why Trump’s ‘Emergency’ Tariffs Won’t Fly

The trade deficit isn’t a sudden surprise, short in duration, and great in harm: the usual characteristics of an emergency.

John Yoo
Constitutionalism
Sep 2, 2025
Democracy in Britain: The Lords’ Work

Part 2: How the “hereditary peers” enhance lawmaking and support the soft power of the UK.

David L. Leal
Constitutionalism
Aug 6, 2025
The American Revolutions of 1776

America's founding was animated by both the spirit of liberty and the spirit of religion — a philosophical and practical achievement worth understanding and attempting to recover today.

Vincent Philip Muñoz
Constitutionalism
Jun 23, 2025
The Progressive Presidency Envelops American Politics

One does not need to revisit the drastic consequences that ensued from COVID-19 policies to be reminded of the failures and mistakes of the progressive constitutional framework that issued them.

Richard M. Reinsch II
Constitutionalism
May 27, 2025

Epstein: Tim Kaine’s Misunderstanding of Natural Rights

Constitutionalism
Sep 15, 2025
1:05

Why Postliberalism Is Gaining Ground: Phillip Muñoz on America’s Founding Values

Constitutionalism
Aug 7, 2025
1:05

Richard Epstein: The Constitution, Parental Rights, and More

Constitutionalism
Jul 7, 2025
1:05

Yuval Levin on How the Constitution Unified our Nation – and Could Again

Constitutionalism
Mar 27, 2025
1:05

WSJ: The Legal Theory Behind Trump’s Plan to Consolidate Power

Constitutionalism
Mar 11, 2025
1:05
No items found.
No items found.
Living With and Coping With Gerrymandering

At best, the problem only has partial solutions.

Richard Epstein
Constitutionalism
Sep 10, 2025
Humphrey’s Executor and the Future of Presidential Power

The U.S. Supreme Court is almost certain to hold that President Trump lawfully fired Rebecca Slaughter from her role as a Commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission.

Aaron L. Nielson
Constitutionalism
Sep 9, 2025
Restoring the Constitution’s Presidency: Modifying Myers and Overruling Humphrey’s

The Constitution’s President is a modest republican magistrate with a considerable but still limited job description.

Robert G. Natelson
Constitutionalism
Sep 9, 2025
What Could the Supreme Court Rule About Trump's Tariffs?

While the Federal Circuit erred in its reading of IEEPA, it still reached the right result because of a question it strangely avoided.

John Yoo
Constitutionalism
Sep 8, 2025
No items found.