Example Image
Civitas Outlook
Topic
Constitutionalism
Published on
Feb 27, 2025
Contributors
John Yoo
Photo by Suzy Brooks on Unsplash

Rational Nondelegation

Contributors
John Yoo
John Yoo
Senior Research Fellow
John Yoo
Summary
The nondelegation doctrine, which forbids Congress from transferring excessive power to the executive branch, has risen from the dead.
Summary
The nondelegation doctrine, which forbids Congress from transferring excessive power to the executive branch, has risen from the dead.

This article was originally published in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy (Volume 47; Issue 3).

Nondelegation has risen from the dead. In the United States, the doctrine stands for the proposition that the Constitution forbids Congress from transferring excessive power to the executive branch to issue rules and make decisions with the force of law.“[T]he legislature makes, the executive executes, and the judiciary construes the law,” Chief Justice John Marshall observed in Wayman v. Southard. Nevertheless, he wrote, “the maker of the law may commit something to the discretion of the other departments.” In upholding a federal statute allowing the courts to set their rules of procedure, Chief Justice Marshall acknowledged that “the precise boundary of this power is a subject of delicate and difficult inquiry, into which a Court will not enter unnecessarily.

Despite the doctrine’s ancient lineage, the modern federal judiciary has found that inquiry so delicate and difficult as to have given up on the task. Since the New Deal, for example, the Supreme Court has never struck down a delegation for exceeding separation of powers limits. In Whitman v. American Trucking Association, theCourt unanimously upheld one of the broadest legislative delegations known: the Clean Air Act’s authorization that the Environmental Protection Agency set air quality standards “to protect the public health” with “an adequate margin of safety.” Indeed, the Court last invalidated a delegation of rulemaking power in two 1935 cases. Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan and A.L.A. Schechter PoultryCorp. v. United States even helped trigger President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s court-packing plan and the Court’s retreat from the close scrutiny of economic regulation.

Academics have largely declared the doctrine dead. Professors Eric Posner and Adrian Vermeule provocatively argue that Congress could delegate virtually all of its legislative power to the agencies. John Manning and Cass Sunstein separately observe that the values of the doctrine live on—at best—only in canons of statutory construction. Peter Schuck argues that “most broad delegations satisfy the formal requirements” of the Constitution and that, therefore, the merits of nondelegation really “turn on functional considerations” rather than constitutional ones.

Continue reading at the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy

00
1x
10:13
More articles

Transatlantic Trade War Produces No Winners

Economic Dynamism
Mar 26, 2025

Why Legal Education Needs Abraham Lincoln

Constitutionalism
Mar 26, 2025
View all

Join the newsletter

Receive new publications, news, and updates from the Civitas Institute.

Sign up
More on

Constitutionalism

What is an Establishment of Religion? And What Does Disestablishment Require?

Vincent Phillip Muñoz reviews a new book about the Establishment Clause.

Vincent Phillip Muñoz
Constitutionalism
Dec 16, 2024
No items found.
Trump’s Risky Reliance on the Alien Enemies Act

A symbolic show of resolve on illegal immigration could hamper Trump’s effort to revive the Monroe Doctrine.

John Yoo, Robert Delahunty
Constitutionalism
Mar 21, 2025
Trump’s Worthy Effort to Rein In ‘Independent’ Agencies

The Trump administration is making a bold and principled attempt to restore these wayward bodies to the control of the executive branch.

John Yoo & Robert Delahunty
Constitutionalism
Mar 3, 2025
Challenging the Claremont View of Birthright Citizenship

Questions for my friends at the Claremont Institute on the 14th Amendment.

John Yoo
Constitutionalism
Feb 20, 2025
Trump And Vance Aren’t Defying The Constitution, They’re Following It

John Yoo, Robert Delahunty
Constitutionalism
Feb 12, 2025

WSJ: The Legal Theory Behind Trump’s Plan to Consolidate Power

Constitutionalism
Mar 11, 2025
1:05

Litigation Update: Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition

Constitutionalism
Mar 7, 2025
1:05

John Yoo: Supreme Court Temporarily Allows Trump’s Freeze on USAID Payments

Constitutionalism
Feb 27, 2025
1:05

John Yoo: President Trump Is Trying to Restore Energy to the Executive

Constitutionalism
Feb 19, 2025
1:05

John Yoo: Trump Is Trying to ‘Restore the Energetic Executive That Our Founders Wanted’

Constitutionalism
Feb 12, 2025
1:05
No items found.
No items found.
Why Legal Education Needs Abraham Lincoln

Ilya Shapiro's Lawless: The Miseducation of America’s Elites unveils the corruption in legal education.

Michael Lucchese
Constitutionalism
Mar 26, 2025
Impeachment: Is Judge Boasberg Guilty of a “High . . . Misdemeanor?”

The phrase “high . . . Misdemeanors” means non-capital, but serious, crimes explains the organization of the Article II Impeachment clause.

Robert G. Natelson
Constitutionalism
Mar 25, 2025
Ending D.E.I. Is Only Half the Battle

The next step in ending government-backed discrimination is replacing it with merit, aptitude, and hard work.

GianCarlo Canaparo
Constitutionalism
Mar 24, 2025
State-Led Lawfare Eclipses Freedom-Preserving Federalism

State attorneys general seem more interested in forcing federal policy into alignment with their political priors.

Jonathan H. Adler
Constitutionalism
Mar 21, 2025
No items found.