The Originalist Case for Birthright Citizenship
A Supreme Court guided by originalist principles should affirm the constitutionality of birthright citizenship.
On his first day in office, President Donald Trump ordered a wholesale change in the federal government's immigration policies. The central symbolic issue was birthright citizenship. In an executive order titled "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship," Trump forbade the government from recognizing the citizenship of any child born in the United States to parents who are not American citizens or permanent-resident aliens. The order has thus far attracted three major lawsuits as well as four unfavorable district-court decisions. On May 15, 2025, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in these cases.
Trump's executive order was intended to deliver on his campaign promise to reduce illegal immigration and deport millions of immigrants who have entered the country unlawfully. But the truth is that birthright citizenship has little to do with the real problems plaguing our nation's immigration system. The Pew Research Center estimates that, within the 22 million U.S. households that include an unauthorized immigrant, 1.3 million individuals were born to illegal aliens, even as an estimated 3 million illegal aliens crossed the southern border annually during the Biden administration. Our immigration system broke down not because of our nation's practice of granting citizenship to all born within the country's borders, but because the Biden administration refused to secure the southern border and enforce existing law. Ending birthright citizenship would thus do little to slow illegal migration.
Constitutionalism
Epstein & Yoo: Amicus Brief in Supreme Court of Maryland
Civitas Senior Research Fellows Richard Epstein and John Yoo, alongside the Mountain States Legal Foundation, filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of Maryland.
.webp)
Religious Exemptions?: What the Free Exercise Clause Means
A conversation among three religious liberty scholars on the Free Exercise Clause’s original meaning.
The American Revolutions of 1776
America's founding was animated by both the spirit of liberty and the spirit of religion — a philosophical and practical achievement worth understanding and attempting to recover today.
.webp)
.webp)
Civitas Conversations: Is the Court Appeasing the Trump Administration?
A Conversation with Jonathan Adler about judicial overreach v. judicial limits.
States Should Protect Religious Liberty Like It Is 1993
We encourage elected officials to get to work in their laboratories and start inventing or adopting new ways to better protect what many of our Founding Fathers called “the sacred rights of conscience.”
