Trump Should Win His Court Battle with Newsom over Riot Response
The Constitution and the laws are on the president’s side.
Earlier this week, the U.S. appeals court in San Francisco heard arguments in Gavin Newsom v. Donald Trump on whether the president can dispatch troops to quell the Los Angeles riots. But the judges first should realize that the Constitution gives them little right to second-guess the executive’s exercise of powers over the military during an emergency. If they press ahead to exercise judicial review over the deployment, they will not only disregard the limits on their own powers, but they will also undermine the national government’s ability to act decisively in moments of crisis.
Two weeks of anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles called for decisive presidential action. Television news video displayed violence that obstructed the enforcement of federal immigration law. Protesters launched violent riots to forcibly blockade and enter federal buildings, attack federal officers, and prevent Department of Homeland Security agents from carrying out their duties. Protesters shut down freeways, set cars on fire, and attacked traffic. Disorder spread to other cities, such as Austin, Chicago, and Denver.
Trump called up 4,000 California National Guardsmen and 700 U.S. Marines and deployed them to Los Angeles. Rather than welcome federal assistance to restore order, Governor Gavin Newsom greeted the troops with hostility. He declared the deployment “an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act” and accused Trump of undertaking “the acts of a dictator, not a President.”
Politics
.webp)
Liberal Democracy Reexamined: Leo Strauss on Alexis de Tocqueville
This article explores Leo Strauss’s thoughts on Alexis de Tocqueville in his 1954 “Natural Right” course transcript.
%20(1).avif)
Long Distance Migration as a Two-Step Sorting Process: The Resettlement of Californians in Texas
Here we press the question of whether the well-documented stream of migrants relocating from California to Texas has been sufficient to alter the political complexion of the destination state.
%20(3).avif)
Who's That Knocking? A Study of the Strategic Choices Facing Large-Scale Grassroots Canvassing Efforts
Although there is a consensus that personalized forms of campaign outreach are more likely to be effective at either mobilizing or even persuading voters, there remains uncertainty about how campaigns should implement get-out-the-vote (GOTV) programs, especially at a truly expansive scale.
There's a Perception Gap With the U.S. Economy
As we approach another election cycle, it’s worth asking: what’s real, what’s political theater, and what does it all mean if Democrats regain control of the House?
International Law Is Holding Democracies Back
The United States should use this moment to argue for a different approach to the rules of war.
Trump purged America’s Leftist toxins. Now hubris will be his downfall
From ending DEI madness and net zero to securing the border, he’ll leave the US stronger. But his excesses are inciting a Left-wing backlash
California’s wealth tax tests the limits of progressive politics
Until the country finds a way to convince the average American that extreme wealth does not come at their expense, both the oligarchs and the heavily Democratic professional classes risk experiencing serious tax raids unseen for decades.
Storm Over the Appointment Process
This is not your grandfather’s appointment process; in fact, it’s not even your older brother’s.
The Clash of Civilizations at 30
Three decades on, Huntington did not foresee the extent to which the West would erode, but he did perceive the warning signs.
