Trump Should Win His Court Battle with Newsom over Riot Response
The Constitution and the laws are on the president’s side.
Earlier this week, the U.S. appeals court in San Francisco heard arguments in Gavin Newsom v. Donald Trump on whether the president can dispatch troops to quell the Los Angeles riots. But the judges first should realize that the Constitution gives them little right to second-guess the executive’s exercise of powers over the military during an emergency. If they press ahead to exercise judicial review over the deployment, they will not only disregard the limits on their own powers, but they will also undermine the national government’s ability to act decisively in moments of crisis.
Two weeks of anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles called for decisive presidential action. Television news video displayed violence that obstructed the enforcement of federal immigration law. Protesters launched violent riots to forcibly blockade and enter federal buildings, attack federal officers, and prevent Department of Homeland Security agents from carrying out their duties. Protesters shut down freeways, set cars on fire, and attacked traffic. Disorder spread to other cities, such as Austin, Chicago, and Denver.
Trump called up 4,000 California National Guardsmen and 700 U.S. Marines and deployed them to Los Angeles. Rather than welcome federal assistance to restore order, Governor Gavin Newsom greeted the troops with hostility. He declared the deployment “an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act” and accused Trump of undertaking “the acts of a dictator, not a President.”
Politics
National Civitas Institute Poll: Americans are Anxious and Frustrated, Creating a Challenging Environment for Leaders
The poll reveals a deeply pessimistic American electorate, with a majority convinced the nation is on the wrong track.
.webp)
Liberal Democracy Reexamined: Leo Strauss on Alexis de Tocqueville
This article explores Leo Strauss’s thoughts on Alexis de Tocqueville in his 1954 “Natural Right” course transcript.
%20(1).avif)
Long Distance Migration as a Two-Step Sorting Process: The Resettlement of Californians in Texas
Here we press the question of whether the well-documented stream of migrants relocating from California to Texas has been sufficient to alter the political complexion of the destination state.
%20(3).avif)
Who's That Knocking? A Study of the Strategic Choices Facing Large-Scale Grassroots Canvassing Efforts
Although there is a consensus that personalized forms of campaign outreach are more likely to be effective at either mobilizing or even persuading voters, there remains uncertainty about how campaigns should implement get-out-the-vote (GOTV) programs, especially at a truly expansive scale.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
The Logic of Pressing for Change in Cuba Now
How can the Trump Administration effect political change that satisfies the United States while appearing organic rather than dictated by Washington?
