Mahmoud Khalil Invites America to Judgment
A free and good society cannot be ‘open’ to everything, no matter how ugly or pernicious.
Predictably, many of the arguments made on behalf of ceasing deportation proceedings against Mahmoud Khalil — a lawful resident alien — turn on his supposed status as a political prisoner of the Trump administration. Those making this case argue that Khalil faces the imminent prospect of deportation because he dared speak on behalf of Palestinian freedom and for the Palestinian victims of Israel’s merciless bombing campaign while he was a graduate student at Columbia University. His incredibly deep legal team is now presenting a set of familiar arguments grounded in America’s commitments to free speech. However, they do so in a manner that demands those commitments be open to virtually any speech claim. They also elide the crucial distinction between citizens and non-citizens.
The government credibly believes Khalil to be a leader of pro-Hamas agitation on Columbia’s campus. At one point, the school suspended him for his activities but then reversed its decision. He was a lead negotiator for Columbia University’s Apartheid Divest (CUAD) during its various encampments and invasions of campus property. CUAD, you will recall, extolled Hamas during its protests, celebrated October 7, and declared its encampment at Columbia a “Zionist Free Zone.” Khalil has troubling ties to the organization, which released a statement that “we support liberation by any means necessary, including armed resistance.” Juden Frei.
CUAD believes that it is advancing the cause of liberation by favoring Hamas and related terror groups who wage war against Israel. The New York Times reported that on October 7, 2024, one year after the massacre of Jews in Israel, CUAD published “a newspaper with a headline that used Hamas’s name for it: ‘One Year Since Al-Aqsa Flood, Revolution Until Victory’ . . . over a picture of Hamas fighters breaching the security fence to Israel.” CUAD also wants to undermine “US imperialism” because the group sees America as Israel’s chief ally. Khalil is no victim of conscience, no martyr for free speech.
Politics
.webp)
Liberal Democracy Reexamined: Leo Strauss on Alexis de Tocqueville
This article explores Leo Strauss’s thoughts on Alexis de Tocqueville in his 1954 “Natural Right” course transcript.
%20(1).avif)
Long Distance Migration as a Two-Step Sorting Process: The Resettlement of Californians in Texas
Here we press the question of whether the well-documented stream of migrants relocating from California to Texas has been sufficient to alter the political complexion of the destination state.
%20(3).avif)
Who's That Knocking? A Study of the Strategic Choices Facing Large-Scale Grassroots Canvassing Efforts
Although there is a consensus that personalized forms of campaign outreach are more likely to be effective at either mobilizing or even persuading voters, there remains uncertainty about how campaigns should implement get-out-the-vote (GOTV) programs, especially at a truly expansive scale.
International Law Is Holding Democracies Back
The United States should use this moment to argue for a different approach to the rules of war.
Might the "New Right 5.0" Be the Old Fusionism?
Since the self-conscious conservative movement came together in the 1950s, a "new right" has emerged every few years.
