
Mahmoud Khalil Invites America to Judgment
A free and good society cannot be ‘open’ to everything, no matter how ugly or pernicious.
Predictably, many of the arguments made on behalf of ceasing deportation proceedings against Mahmoud Khalil — a lawful resident alien — turn on his supposed status as a political prisoner of the Trump administration. Those making this case argue that Khalil faces the imminent prospect of deportation because he dared speak on behalf of Palestinian freedom and for the Palestinian victims of Israel’s merciless bombing campaign while he was a graduate student at Columbia University. His incredibly deep legal team is now presenting a set of familiar arguments grounded in America’s commitments to free speech. However, they do so in a manner that demands those commitments be open to virtually any speech claim. They also elide the crucial distinction between citizens and non-citizens.
The government credibly believes Khalil to be a leader of pro-Hamas agitation on Columbia’s campus. At one point, the school suspended him for his activities but then reversed its decision. He was a lead negotiator for Columbia University’s Apartheid Divest (CUAD) during its various encampments and invasions of campus property. CUAD, you will recall, extolled Hamas during its protests, celebrated October 7, and declared its encampment at Columbia a “Zionist Free Zone.” Khalil has troubling ties to the organization, which released a statement that “we support liberation by any means necessary, including armed resistance.” Juden Frei.
CUAD believes that it is advancing the cause of liberation by favoring Hamas and related terror groups who wage war against Israel. The New York Times reported that on October 7, 2024, one year after the massacre of Jews in Israel, CUAD published “a newspaper with a headline that used Hamas’s name for it: ‘One Year Since Al-Aqsa Flood, Revolution Until Victory’ . . . over a picture of Hamas fighters breaching the security fence to Israel.” CUAD also wants to undermine “US imperialism” because the group sees America as Israel’s chief ally. Khalil is no victim of conscience, no martyr for free speech.
Politics
%20Richard%20Samuelson%20%20-%20Is%20American%20Nationalism%20Still%20Creed-able_-1.jpg)
Is American Nationalism Still Creed-able?
We are not there now, but there is reason to worry that the United States is in danger, if we are not careful, of ceasing to be a nation with the principles of 1776 at its core.

National Civitas Institute Poll: Americans are Anxious and Frustrated, Creating a Challenging Environment for Leaders
The poll reveals a deeply pessimistic American electorate, with a majority convinced the nation is on the wrong track.

Why America, Not Iran, Has the Stronger Legal Position in the Current War
There are both long and short time scales for evaluating the current conflict over control of the Strait of Hormuz.

The Cuba Play
Cuba, in relation to China and Russia, poses a threat due to the risk of weapons deployment or strategic positioning in the event of an attack on the US homeland.

The Iran War and the Coming Global Struggle
The United States is growing more risk-tolerant, more willing to accept regional instability as a strategic tool, and deliberately positioning itself for the far greater challenge of confronting China in the coming decades.

Postliberalism’s Hungary Gambit Failed
With Viktor Orbán’s party losing power in Hungary and postliberals at odds with the Trump administration over the Iran War, this iteration of postliberalism looks once again bound not only to fail in terms of its own principles but also to remain politically relevant.

.webp)
%20(1).avif)






.png)
.png)
.png)


