Example Image
Civitas Outlook
Topic
Economic Dynamism
Published on
Apr 16, 2025
Contributors
Veronique de Rugy
(Shutterstock)

Trump Undermines His Growth Agenda for AI

Contributors
Veronique de Rugy
Veronique de Rugy
Veronique de Rugy
Summary
Leading in AI and helping workers requires the rejection of the economic fallacies of the populist left.
Summary
Leading in AI and helping workers requires the rejection of the economic fallacies of the populist left.
Listen to this article

If Republicans are serious about making America the world’s leader in artificial intelligence, and if they truly want to lift workers, they must stop pirating economic policies from the left. The GOP’s ongoing realignment has led to a troubling embrace of protectionism, disturbing flirtations with higher taxes, and the use of class-war rhetoric that’s indistinguishable from progressive talking points.

The irony is that these policies don’t help workers; they hurt workers. And they won’t secure AI leadership; they’ll surrender it.

Many believe winning the AI race is not a symbolic goal but a strategic imperative. Without a thriving, innovation-first ecosystem, America cannot dominate in defense, biotech, advanced manufacturing, or cloud infrastructure. The authors of the recent Executive Order on Reducing the Anti-Competitive Regulatory Barriers seem to understand this point. That E.O. states that "Federal regulations should not predetermine economic winners and losers,” and it plans to remove "Regulations that reduce competition, entrepreneurship, and innovation—as well as the benefits they create for American consumers—should be eliminated."

However, an innovative ecosystem also relies on market-driven capital formation, fast scaling, and wide and ready access to inputs—all of which are undermined by the policies many Republicans now embrace.

Take tax policy. It’s no secret that Democrats have long proclaimed their desire to jack up taxes on the rich and corporations – on wealth and capital – without caring about the negative impact on investment and global competitiveness of the U.S. Until recently, Republicans took the opposite approach. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is a good example of that difference. It lowered the corporate tax rate to 21%, passed full R&D expensing, and introduced other pro-growth provisions. These reforms didn’t favor corporations for the sake of corporations. Instead, these reforms were meant to promote more innovation, higher wages, and better jobs.

Undoing these reforms, including raising taxes on corporations or even on top marginal income earners, as some Republicans are now talking about, would be a self-inflicted wound that Democrats would cheer. And the loudest cheers would come from that party’s left-most flank.

In addition, AI dominance won’t be won in a lab alone; it will be built on a foundation of massive computational power, which depends on abundant, affordable energy. Training large language models, powering data centers, running advanced simulations, and enabling autonomous systems require enormous amounts of electricity. Energy demand from AI and cloud computing is expected to skyrocket over the next decade. This reality means that America’s ability to lead in AI is inseparable from its ability to produce and distribute cheap, reliable energy at scale.

If implemented, the Trump administration's deregulatory agenda would be highly conducive to more energy abundance. However, the protectionist policies embraced by Trump and his populist allies directly and massively threaten this energy future. Tariffs on imported steel, aluminum, solar panels, and critical minerals raise energy infrastructure costs—everything from power lines and substations to wind turbines and battery storage. Add tariffs on other inputs, and you get a full-spectrum attack on the very supply chains needed to support advanced computing. This protectionism is economic self-sabotage disguised as patriotism.

Worse still, tariffs and economic chaos have broader geopolitical consequences. As Adam Thierer of R Street points out, “Trump’s trade war is going to undermine much of the good that Trump’s AI agenda could do, especially by driving old allies right into the arms of the Chinese govt.” He warns that U.S. allies like the EU might soon “cut a deal with the CCP to run DeepSeek & other Chinese AI on everything and box out US AI apps entirely.” In other words, protectionism isn’t just bad economics; it’s a strategic gift to Beijing.

If America wants to dominate AI, it must be the easiest place in the world to build data centers, deploy energy infrastructure, and scale up high-tech manufacturing. It cannot afford a bureaucratic maze with artificially inflated costs. Protectionism doesn't protect American workers; it protects inefficiency. Tariffs are a tax on us, and they are a tax especially on the very future we claim to want. In the race for AI, where speed and scale are everything, inefficiency is fatal.

Unfortunately, the need to defend the president’s protectionist policies and their wealth destruction has also led some administration members, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in particular, to embrace one of Democrats’ favorite economic myths: pitting Wall Street against Main Street. Peddling this myth was recently decried by the Editorial Board of the Wall Street Journal, who wrote in response to Trump-era tariff rhetoric:

Everyone wants Main Street to prosper, but pitting Wall Street against the rest of the country is one of the hoariest pages in the faux populist handbook… Wall Street as defined by the stock and financial markets is integral to prosperity on Main Street.

Exactly. Financial markets aren’t the enemy of working people; they’re how businesses get funded, workers get hired, and retirements get secured. About 60% of Americans own stocks directly or through retirement accounts. When tariffs or taxes spook the market, it’s not hedge funds that suffer most; it’s middle-income Americans watching their 401(k)s shrink.

Capital and labor are not adversaries. They are partners in economic growth. Republicans tempted by a class-warfare rhetoric should remember this bit of wisdom from the great economist Thomas Sowell. He said:

It was Thomas Edison who brought us electricity, not the Sierra Club. It was the Wright brothers who got us off the ground, not the Federal Aviation Administration. It was Henry Ford who ended the isolation of millions of Americans by making the automobile affordable, not Ralph Nadder.
Those who have helped the poor the most have not been those who have gone around loudly expressing “compassion” for the poor, but those who found ways to make industry more productive and distribution more efficient, so that the poor today can afford things that the affluent of yesterday could only dream about.

The future belongs to the country that gets its policies right—policies on innovation, labor, capital, and trade. America has every advantage: world-class institutions, an entrepreneurial culture, deep and sophisticated capital markets, and a skilled workforce. But we risk squandering all of it by peddling bad ideas borrowed from the left.

Populist slogans will not win the AI race, tariffs will not build resilient supply chains, and higher taxes will not create high-wage jobs. Republicans once understood this reality. If they want to lead again, they should stop railing against the free market and build a future that works for everyone.

Veronique de Rugy is the George Gibbs Chair in Political Economy and Senior Research Fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University and a nationally syndicated columnist. She is a contributing editor to Civitas Outlook.

10:13
1x
10:13
More articles

The Worst Thing about Trump’s Approach to Trade

Economic Dynamism
Jun 18, 2025

Looking West: Trade and America’s Future in the Asia-Pacific

Economic Dynamism
Jun 18, 2025
View all

Join the newsletter

Receive new publications, news, and updates from the Civitas Institute.

Sign up
More on

Economic Dynamism

Defending Technological Dynamism & the Freedom to Innovate in the Age of AI

Human flourishing, economic growth, and geopolitical resilience requires innovation—especially in artificial intelligence.

Adam Thierer
Economic Dynamism
Jun 6, 2025
Partisan Trust in the Federal Reserve

This paper examines partisanship in public perceptions of the Federal Reserve.

Carola Binder, Cody Couture, Abhiprerna Smit
Economic Dynamism
Apr 22, 2025
The American Dream Is Not a Coin Flip, and Wages Have Not Stagnated

This paper challenges the prevailing narrative that stagnant wages are causing the American dream to fade. It contrasts subjective public opinion with revised objective intergenerational mobility measures.

Scott Winship
Economic Dynamism
Mar 6, 2025
Political Economy and the Rise of Commercial Humanism

Western attitudes toward commerce have transformed from early moral condemnation to a modern appreciation that sees trade as socially beneficial.

Erik Matson
Economic Dynamism
Feb 28, 2025
No items found.
Locked Out of the Dream: Regulation Making Homes Unaffordable Around the World

The first in a two-part series on the global housing crisis.

Joel Kotkin
Economic Dynamism
Jun 5, 2025
A Most Favored National Policy for Pharma Drugs Makes Sense

"Most favored nation" pricing can help make America's pharmaceutical marketplace more competitive.

Dirk Mateer
Economic Dynamism
May 19, 2025
The High Cost of California’s Green Energy Policies

California can only prosper if it can develop affordable, reliable energy from all sources, including the state’s fossil fuel supplies.

Joel Kotkin
Economic Dynamism
May 7, 2025
A Bad Business on the Bayou

Chevron finds itself the victim of a political alliance between the tort bar and Louisiana Republicans.

Michael Toth
Economic Dynamism
Apr 1, 2025

Can the U.S. Defense Industrial Base Meet Today’s Challenges?

Economic Dynamism
May 13, 2025
1:05

Virginia Postrel and Adam Thierer on Big Trends and Big Ideas in Dynamism

Economic Dynamism
Apr 29, 2025
1:05

Joel Mokyr on American Dynamism vs. Techno-pessimism

Economic Dynamism
Apr 29, 2025
1:05

Arthur Herman on Mobility, Markets, and Natural Law

Economic Dynamism
Apr 29, 2025
1:05

Dignity and Dynamism: The Future of Conservative Technology Policy

Economic Dynamism
Mar 5, 2025
1:05
No items found.
No items found.
The Worst Thing about Trump’s Approach to Trade

The precedents set by President Trump will create serious problems for future interactions between the business sector and the state.

Paul Mueller
Economic Dynamism
Jun 18, 2025
Looking West: Trade and America’s Future in the Asia-Pacific

In what world does it make sense for the United States to allow Beijing to slowly turn the Asia-Pacific rim into a Chinese-dominated economic lake from which America is excluded?

Samuel Gregg
Economic Dynamism
Jun 18, 2025
Generative AI Is Expanding Rapidly in 2025

Our survey results suggest that LLM tools are augmenting and enhancing work productivity rather than replacing it.

Jon Hartley
Economic Dynamism
Jun 17, 2025
Will Companies Doing Business with the Federal Government Face New Litigation Threats?

A new case could establish a precedent to ensnare future military contractors, health care companies, and other federal contractors in hostile state court litigation.

Michael Toth
Economic Dynamism
Jun 4, 2025
No items found.