An M.I.A. Congress Exacerbates the Clash Between Trump and the Courts
Congress has to step up and take some responsibility for the shaping of public policy.
Despite the hand-wringing of the commentariat, the fights between the Trump White House and some federal trial judges has yet to reach a “constitutional crisis.” A few federal district judges have issued scores of injunctions temporarily blocking some elements of Trump’s agenda for his first 100 days. But rather than a breakdown in the constitutional order, this jostling fulfills the Framers’ design for the separation of powers, which encourages conflict between the branches of government.
Some blame the problem on an overly aggressive Donald Trump, bent on expanding executive power beyond constitutional limits. Others criticize Democrat-appointed federal district judges, seeing them as politicized activists forming the spearhead of unconstitutional resistance to Trump’s initiatives. In these visions, we have an Imperial Presidency pitted against an Imperial Judiciary.
In fact, the conflict between Trump and the courts has escalated not because of any threat to the Constitution, but because of the dog that did not bark. In the famous Sherlock Holmes story, the great detective solves the case because a guard dog did not bark at night — revealing the dog’s owner to be the killer. Today, the missing dog is Congress. Congress could settle many of the disputes slowing the Trump agenda if it were simply to step forward and fulfill its constitutional responsibilities. As Andy McCarthy observed yesterday, Congress could even defuse the growing conflict between Trump and the courts over the deportation of Venezuelan gang members.
Politics
National Civitas Institute Poll: Americans are Anxious and Frustrated, Creating a Challenging Environment for Leaders
The poll reveals a deeply pessimistic American electorate, with a majority convinced the nation is on the wrong track.
.webp)
Liberal Democracy Reexamined: Leo Strauss on Alexis de Tocqueville
This article explores Leo Strauss’s thoughts on Alexis de Tocqueville in his 1954 “Natural Right” course transcript.
%20(1).avif)
Long Distance Migration as a Two-Step Sorting Process: The Resettlement of Californians in Texas
Here we press the question of whether the well-documented stream of migrants relocating from California to Texas has been sufficient to alter the political complexion of the destination state.
%20(3).avif)
Who's That Knocking? A Study of the Strategic Choices Facing Large-Scale Grassroots Canvassing Efforts
Although there is a consensus that personalized forms of campaign outreach are more likely to be effective at either mobilizing or even persuading voters, there remains uncertainty about how campaigns should implement get-out-the-vote (GOTV) programs, especially at a truly expansive scale.
Parliament, Country, and Friendship
James Grant’s delightful Friends Until the End also has much to tell us about the character of statesmen and the power (and limits) of rhetoric.
Why Can’t We Have a Real Filibuster?
The history of congressional reform is the history of unintended consequences.
