
Civitas Symposium: Statesmanship and the American Presidency
Who are our American statesmen, and what can we learn from them?
How should we think about statesmanship and presidential power? As Steven Hayward observes in this symposium, we are uncomfortable with even acknowledging that a category of statesmanship should exist. Statesmanship implies discriminating judgment about character, prudence, magnanimity, and justice. The modern liberal mind can't even, as the kids say. Yet we are also stuck with executive leadership, even in a modern constitutional republic. So, who are our American statesmen, and what can we learn from them?
We can draw from different sources to formulate answers to these questions. How did the Founders of American constitutionalism think about character and executive power? Do the progressives provide better sources of thinking about this issue? How would institutions influence or condition executive decision-making? What about the size of government today and the exercise of presidential power?
To answer these questions and more, we've invited the following contributors:
Joseph Bessette and Gary J. Schmitt “Character and the American Presidency: A View From the Founding"
Steven Hayward “Taming the 21st Century Prince"
Yuval Levin “Big Government Statesmanship"
Constitutionalism

Amicus Brief: Hon. William P. Barr and Hon. Michael B. Mukasey in Support of Petitioners
Former AGs Barr and Mukasey Cite Civitas in a SCOTUS Brief

Rational Judicial Review: Constitutions as Power-sharing Agreements, Secession, and the Problem of Dred Scott
Judicial review and originalism serve as valuable commitment mechanisms to enforce future compliance with a political bargain.

What’s Wrong with a Military Campaign Against the Drug Trade
Trump’s boat strikes against the cartels risk crossing the line between law enforcement and war.

The Long History of Presidential Discretion
The Framers did not expect Congress to preauthorize every use of force or to manage military campaigns.

The Myth of Milliken
Shep Melnick evaluates Michelle Adams' new scholarly attempt to return Milliken v. Bradley and the story of Detroit school busing to the court of public opinion.

United States v. Lopez at 30: The Court’s Federalism Revolution Didn’t Happen
Why did the Court's federalism revolution go out with a whimper?

.avif)






.avif)
.avif)

.webp)
.webp)

